Do you think that
Exploratory Testing is more than Superficial Bug Hunting? Explain why?
As both
the techniques i.e. Exploratory Testing & Superficial Bug Hunting are used
in finding the escape defects that are not covered in test case scenarios but
in my views Superficial Bug Hunting is more helpful in finding those such
errors. ET will be done by those testing team who have already tested the
application and executed the test cases but in bug hunt we use the testers who
haven’t worked on that application. These testers would think from different
prospective as compare to the team having a prior knowledge. Secondly ET will
be done when all the SBT & RBT test cases have been executed and Bug hunt
will perform just prior to the production release. So keeping the above points
in mind we can say that Superficial Bug Hunting is more beneficial than ET.
Do you want more on this, please log on to: http://www.qainfotech.com/
No comments:
Post a Comment